Subject: Re: [boost] Application need a Review Manager. Anyone is interested?
From: Brian Wood (woodbrian77_at_[hidden])
Date: 2014-04-24 00:09:31
> Yeah, I'd definitely redouble my advice to break up Application into
> smaller, standalone, reusable bits. The problem with any overarching
> framework is that it's a vision (i.e. your vision), and other
> people's visions never peer review well, whether in academia, here in
> Boost, or anywhere. Also, unless you're a member of Boost's steering
> committee and/or on the C++ standards committee, any vision you
> propose probably won't be given any benefit of the doubt
Some might think: If you can't beat 'em, join 'em.
My motto though is: If you can't join 'em, beat 'em.
-- Brian Ebenezer Enterprises - "A fool with a plan can beat a genius with no plan." T. Boone Pickens http://webEbenezer.net
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk