|
Boost : |
Subject: Re: [boost] [Boost-users] [typeindex v3.0] Peer review begins Mon 21st ends Wed 30th
From: Rob Stewart (robertstewart_at_[hidden])
Date: 2014-04-27 13:02:41
On April 27, 2014 10:43:27 AM EDT, Andrey Semashev <andrey.semashev_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>On Friday 25 April 2014 09:25:45 Dominique Devienne wrote:
>>
>> But what bothered me a little was the note about the fact that
>> pretty_name() was not consistent across platforms/compilers.
>
>There is generally no way to obtain a portable type name. Each compiler
>and
>platform has its own mangling rules and there are no rules for the
>demangled
>type names whatsoever.
The language standard specifies rules for the demangled names, does it not?
___
Rob
(Sent from my portable computation engine)
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk