Subject: Re: [boost] [GSoC, MPL11] Community probe
From: Louis Dionne (ldionne.2_at_[hidden])
Date: 2014-04-29 17:42:29
Roland Bock <rbock <at> eudoxos.de> writes:
> I agree completely. I recently developed my own type set since I could
> not use MPL (no full variadicity) or the standard library (no type set).
> And even though it was kind of fun to implement, I would have preferred
> to use something from the standard (or from something aiming to become
> the standard).
By any chance, would the type set implementation happen to be public?
I know of a couple different ways to implement those, but it's always good
to see what others have done.
> That being said, I think you should aim for TMP14. Personally I would
> very much consider C++14 plus Concepts Lite, because you are building a
> library for the future, not for the past.
As I currently view things, C++14 won't be such a game changer wrt TMP,
but I must look into Concepts Lite more seriously before that's definitive.
See my answer to Gonzalo for more on that.
TYVM for your input,
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk