Subject: Re: [boost] [GSoC, MPL11] Community probe
From: Agustín K-ballo Bergé (kaballo86_at_[hidden])
Date: 2014-04-30 23:10:52
On 30/04/2014 07:34 p.m., Louis Dionne wrote:
> As an aside, I think your `all_t` and `any_t` metafunctions could be
> more efficient. I'm currently (literally right now) benchmarking different
> implementations for those; I will notify you if there is a better alternative.
I don't know which implementations you are considering (are they
publicly available online?), but here is one I found to perform good enough:
Just drop the `constexpr` since it's not actually needed and it confuses
GCC. It's a bug according to my reading of [expr.unary.noexcept]/3, but
I didn't have the time to investigate further yet.
-- Agustín K-ballo Bergé.- http://talesofcpp.fusionfenix.com
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk