Boost logo

Boost :

Subject: Re: [boost] [GSoC, MPL11] Community probe
From: Niall Douglas (s_sourceforge_at_[hidden])
Date: 2014-05-03 10:05:19

On 2 May 2014 at 23:35, Louis Dionne wrote:

> > What's wrong with MPL v2.0?
> In what namespace should the library live?

There is Boost precedent for this e.g. boost::phoenix or

In short, your namespace would be boost::mpl. MPL98 might be rehoused
into boost::mpl::v1 and yours might be mapped into boost::mpl::v2. A
C macro define then maps the user selected namespace version into
boost::mpl, with the default usually being the most recent version.

For now you can use boost::mpl::v2 safely. If you just happened to
invest the work in remapping existing MPL into boost::mpl::v1 in
preparation but keeping v1 mapped into boost::mpl, I would doubt
anyone here would complain.


Currently unemployed and looking for work in Ireland.
Work Portfolio:

Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at