Subject: Re: [boost] [GSoC, MPL11] Community probe
From: Klaim - JoÃ«l Lamotte (mjklaim_at_[hidden])
Date: 2014-05-03 13:00:47
On Sat, May 3, 2014 at 4:05 PM, Niall Douglas <s_sourceforge_at_[hidden]>wrote:
> On 2 May 2014 at 23:35, Louis Dionne wrote:
> > > What's wrong with MPL v2.0?
> > In what namespace should the library live?
> There is Boost precedent for this e.g. boost::phoenix or
> In short, your namespace would be boost::mpl. MPL98 might be rehoused
> into boost::mpl::v1 and yours might be mapped into boost::mpl::v2. A
> C macro define then maps the user selected namespace version into
> boost::mpl, with the default usually being the most recent version.
> For now you can use boost::mpl::v2 safely. If you just happened to
> invest the work in remapping existing MPL into boost::mpl::v1 in
> preparation but keeping v1 mapped into boost::mpl, I would doubt
> anyone here would complain.
The other precedent is boost::signals2
> Currently unemployed and looking for work in Ireland.
> Work Portfolio: http://careers.stackoverflow.com/nialldouglas/
> Unsubscribe & other changes:
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk