Re: [boost] [GSoC, MPL11] Community probe

Subject: Re: [boost] [GSoC, MPL11] Community probe
From: Klaim - Joël Lamotte (mjklaim_at_[hidden])
Date: 2014-05-03 13:00:47

On Sat, May 3, 2014 at 4:05 PM, Niall Douglas <s_sourceforge_at_[hidden]>wrote:

> On 2 May 2014 at 23:35, Louis Dionne wrote:
>
> > > What's wrong with MPL v2.0?
> >
> > In what namespace should the library live?
>
> There is Boost precedent for this e.g. boost::phoenix or
> boost::python.
>
> In short, your namespace would be boost::mpl. MPL98 might be rehoused
> into boost::mpl::v1 and yours might be mapped into boost::mpl::v2. A
> C macro define then maps the user selected namespace version into
> boost::mpl, with the default usually being the most recent version.
>
> For now you can use boost::mpl::v2 safely. If you just happened to
> invest the work in remapping existing MPL into boost::mpl::v1 in
> preparation but keeping v1 mapped into boost::mpl, I would doubt
> anyone here would complain.
>

The other precedent is boost::signals2

>
> Niall
>
> --
> Currently unemployed and looking for work in Ireland.
> Work Portfolio: http://careers.stackoverflow.com/nialldouglas/
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Unsubscribe & other changes:
> http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
>