Subject: Re: [boost] Community Maintenance Team and neglected libraries
From: Daniel James (dnljms_at_[hidden])
Date: 2014-05-15 17:44:58
On 15 May 2014 22:35, Beman Dawes <bdawes_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> This is one of the specific examples we have been discussing at C++Now in
> Aspen this week.
> * You did the right thing when you submitted pull requests.
> * Your should get some form of response within a reasonable period of time.
> It will take the CMT awhile to put a specific time on "reasonable" but
> certainly a month with no response is not reasonable.
> * Please post a message on the CMT mailing list, with links to the pull
> requests that you haven't heard anything about. It is their responsibility
> to decide how to proceed.
> * If you have questions about global maintenance changes touching many
> libraries, the CMT list is the best place to ask for guidance. The CMT
> folks care about maintenance so it is not spamming the list to ask them
> maintenance related questions.
Please can you (or someone else if appropriate) write a short
description of the CMT list for the website? Also, does the
description of the development list need to change? I'll deal with the
html if necessary.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk