Subject: Re: [boost] Is there any interest in a library for actor programming? [preliminary submission]
From: Matthias Vallentin (vallentin_at_[hidden])
Date: 2014-05-15 19:53:25
(Disclaimer: I'm a libcppa user for quite a while now.)
> attached you'll find the first preliminary submission for Boost.Actor
> as ZIP file along with the Manual in PDF version.
I would like to express my full support for Boost.Actor. The number one
reason why I believe we need the library in Boost, is that the library
raises the level abstraction for concurrent and network-transparent
message passing in a type-safe manner. It provides a framework allowing
users to efficiently harness (i) all available cores on a modern
multi-core machine, (ii) general-purpose clusters, and (iii) the compute
power of graphics card via OpenCL .
My own experiences with libcppa:
- Quick round-trips on mailing list and during bug reports
- Low CPU overhead (<=5%)
- Works robust and stable since 0.9
In the past, I attempted to build a similar abstraction out of 0mq and
Boost.Asio, with mildly put, limited success. Therefore I am thrilled to
see someone attempting to implement the actor model natively The Right
By adopting the library in Boost, users would receive a tool to express
their concurrent and distributed programs while focussing on the
challenges of their domain, as opposed to grappling with low-level
intricacies of data structure synchronization and threading. Personally,
I found it immensely productive to not having to worry about data races
anymore, as these are eradicated by design.
 This is a feature of libcppa and not planned for Boost.Actor,
although the functionality should remain in some form.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk