Subject: Re: [boost] Thoughts on Boost v2
From: Sergey Popov (loonycyborg_at_[hidden])
Date: 2014-05-16 14:35:06
On Fri, 16 May 2014 14:07:36 -0400
Sohail Somani <sohail_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> I say a big fat yes to CMake. I love the elegance of bjam but CMake +
> Ninja is ridiculous. CMake is elegant in its own way.
I'd say big fat no to cmake. It's as silly as autotools if not more so.
I'm tired of makefile generators and wouldn't contribute to any project
requiring me to using them. I don't care if it's ninja or GNU make.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk