Subject: Re: [boost] [filesystem] Request for comments on proposedrelative() function
From: Beman Dawes (bdawes_at_[hidden])
Date: 2014-05-16 18:18:51
On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 7:20 AM, Peter Dimov <lists_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> Yakov Galka wrote:
> relative(x,y) returns a path z (unique up to equivalence), if exists,
>> such that y / z = x (up to equivalence)
> If you allow z to be an absolute path, it'd never be unique when x is
> absolute, because x would be a trivial solution then. This is why I don't
> particularly like
> relative( d:/, c:a/b ) == c:a/b
As proposed, lexically_relative("d:/", "c:a/b") is an error.
The semantics are deliberately conservative in that p must be prefixed with
base, rather than trying to invent some possible semantics for the case
where the two arguments appear to have no lexical connection.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk