Boost logo

Boost :

Subject: Re: [boost] Standalone boost::ignore_unused_variable_warning()
From: Rob Stewart (robertstewart_at_[hidden])
Date: 2014-05-19 20:28:28

On May 19, 2014 11:26:49 AM EDT, Adam Wulkiewicz <adam.wulkiewicz_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>Then probably also
>boost::ignore_unused_variable(v1) ;
>boost::ignore_unused_variables(v1, v2, v3);
>for consistency.

Actually, I'd favor ignore_unused(). I see no reason for "variable" to be in the name. If you use a macro, then you'd need to distinguish between TYPEDEFs and VARIABLEs.

>Or would putting it in boost::utility/BOOST_UTILITY be a better idea?

Glen's argument against config makes sense. Utility doesn't seem unreasonable.


(Sent from my portable computation engine)

Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at