Subject: Re: [boost] Standalone boost::ignore_unused_variable_warning()
From: Rob Stewart (robertstewart_at_[hidden])
Date: 2014-05-19 20:28:28
On May 19, 2014 11:26:49 AM EDT, Adam Wulkiewicz <adam.wulkiewicz_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>Then probably also
>boost::ignore_unused_variables(v1, v2, v3);
Actually, I'd favor ignore_unused(). I see no reason for "variable" to be in the name. If you use a macro, then you'd need to distinguish between TYPEDEFs and VARIABLEs.
>Or would putting it in boost::utility/BOOST_UTILITY be a better idea?
Glen's argument against config makes sense. Utility doesn't seem unreasonable.
(Sent from my portable computation engine)
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk