|
Boost : |
Subject: Re: [boost] Standalone boost::ignore_unused_variable_warning()
From: Rob Stewart (robertstewart_at_[hidden])
Date: 2014-05-19 20:28:28
On May 19, 2014 11:26:49 AM EDT, Adam Wulkiewicz <adam.wulkiewicz_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>>
>Then probably also
>
>boost::ignore_unused_variable(v1) ;
>boost::ignore_unused_variables(v1, v2, v3);
>
>for consistency.
Actually, I'd favor ignore_unused(). I see no reason for "variable" to be in the name. If you use a macro, then you'd need to distinguish between TYPEDEFs and VARIABLEs.
>Or would putting it in boost::utility/BOOST_UTILITY be a better idea?
Glen's argument against config makes sense. Utility doesn't seem unreasonable.
___
Rob
(Sent from my portable computation engine)
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk