Re: [boost] Thoughts on Boost v2

Subject: Re: [boost] Thoughts on Boost v2
From: David Stone (david_at_[hidden])
Date: 2014-05-19 21:47:10

As the author of bounded::integer, I do intend to submit my library to
Boost at some point, for whatever that is worth. It's just not in a state
that is ready to submit yet (but soon it will be). I suspect that, as a
C++14 library, it will have an interesting process getting in, but maybe
the next Visual Studio preview will be out by then, which looks like it
might support all the features I need.

On Sat, May 17, 2014 at 4:30 AM, John Maddock <boost.regex_at_[hidden]>wrote:

> Well, let us iterate the libraries which were presented this C++ Now
>> conference which are not in Boost and have no (to my knowledge)
>> intention to enter Boost. Some of these may not be C++11, it was hard
>> to tell from the talk description, but a majority were:
>>
>> * Versor
>>
>
> Interesting, if very domain specific.
>
>
>  * Turtle Mock
>> * BoundedInteger
>> * Mach7
>>
>
> Currently has no docs on the web, so I can't judge.
>
>  * Octopus
>>
>
> Unable to find that one.
>
>  * HPX
>>
>
> From a well known Booster, depends on Boost and is Boost-licenced. Let's
> hope we see it here soon, although it looks like it may still be
> experimental?
>
>
>  * Metashell (or rather its underlying libraries)
>> * libcppa (though Boost.Actor which is based on this is expected)
>> * CppComponents
>>
>
> Interestingly also Boost-licenced, and from a Boost contributor.
>
>
>  * Some sort of C++ idiomatic XML library
>> * Doppl
>>
>
> Couldn't find it.
>
>
>  * sfrp
>>
>> Need I say any more?
>>
>
> Well it would be nice of some of those library authors could chime in with
> their thoughts, otherwise we don't really know one way or another?
>
> Regards, John.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/
> mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
>
>