Subject: Re: [boost] [review] Convert library
From: Vladimir Batov (vb.mail.247_at_[hidden])
Date: 2014-05-26 04:03:11
Vladimir Batov-6 wrote
> ... try and unify all the input so far into a coherent
> requirements specs, have it voted and proceed implementing it...
Meant "design specs" rather than "requirements specs"... quite a difference.
-- View this message in context: http://boost.2283326.n4.nabble.com/review-Convert-library-tp4662821p4662879.html Sent from the Boost - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk