Re: [boost] [convert] An approach that might actually work. :-)

Subject: Re: [boost] [convert] An approach that might actually work. :-)
From: Jeroen Habraken (vexocide_at_[hidden])
Date: 2014-05-26 11:51:14

On 26 May 2014 15:02, Vladimir Batov <vb.mail.247_at_[hidden]> wrote:

> To move forward in a coordinated way how about we create a working group
> (say, >= 5 people). Then we'd address convert-related issues in the order
> of
> importance. Public API first, converter API then, etc. (Or maybe some other
> design altogether). We'd focus on one thing at a time. Discuss it and then
> vote. The solution accepted by the majority wins, we document it and move
> forward to the next item of importance... without running in circles about
> the previous issues... unless we realize down the track that our solution
> is
> flawed somehow.
>
> That won't require any more of the time of the participants than it is now.
> I am happy to coordinate (whatever that might be), do implementation (to
> the
> best of my abilities), etc. Still, if anyone feels strongly about doing
> that
> "coordination" thing, step forward, no drama.
>
> Such collaborative approach would take subjectivity out and might bring new
> unexpected ideas, etc. That I think might actually work. Any one willing to
> sign up? Jeroen, Roland, Rob? What people think? Let me know if you feel
> like participating, contributing... If there is no appetite for that, it's
> still OK.
>

Whilst I, unfortunately, have little time to spare I'm game and would love
to participate in the discussions.

Jeroen