Re: [boost] [modularization] proposal and poll

Subject: Re: [boost] [modularization] proposal and poll
From: Peter Dimov (lists_at_[hidden])
Date: 2014-06-01 11:42:27

Julian Gonggrijp wrote:
> Thank you for this contribution, Peter! Ideally the HTML report is 
> generated from the latter plaintext, of course.

The next version of the program I posted has the option of generating HTML 
directly. You've probably seen the output. If not, do look at a few modules; 
it's good to have an idea of what our future automated downloader would do 
when you tell it to download, say, smart_ptr (in the present state of 
Boost).

> In order for your program to provide input for the automated downloader, I 
> think it would have to provide information at a coarser level of detail, 
> i.e. entire submodules.

But it does provide the information on a submodule level. It just goes into 
more detail to explain the dependency, but this additional output can be 
trivially suppressed. :-)