Re: [boost] [Modularization] About adding sub-modules?

Subject: Re: [boost] [Modularization] About adding sub-modules?
From: Daniel James (dnljms_at_[hidden])
Date: 2014-06-04 14:26:01

On 4 June 2014 19:18, Peter Dimov <lists_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> Andrey Semashev wrote:
>
> On Wednesday 04 June 2014 20:59:34 Peter Dimov wrote:
>>
>> > I'm not very fond of sub-sub-modules. Why not just winapi? This could be
>> > > very useful for those odd people outside Boost who don't really like >
>> > including <windows.h>.
>>
>> I'm ok with winapi name (actually, it sounds better).
>>
>> But I don't want to make it a public library.
>
> OK. So we (read I) make a sub-module winapi, in libs/winapi, with you and
> Vicente having write access, but don't add it to libraries.htm. Right?

It could possibly have a 'meta/libraries.json' file, with an extra
attribute, say "public": false. Then I could hide it on the website,
but add a link to show private libraries.