Re: [boost] [Modularization] About adding sub-modules?

Subject: Re: [boost] [Modularization] About adding sub-modules?
From: Andrey Semashev (andrey.semashev_at_[hidden])
Date: 2014-06-04 14:28:34

On Wednesday 04 June 2014 19:26:01 Daniel James wrote:
> On 4 June 2014 19:18, Peter Dimov <lists_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> > Andrey Semashev wrote:
> > 
> > On Wednesday 04 June 2014 20:59:34 Peter Dimov wrote:
> >> > I'm not very fond of sub-sub-modules. Why not just winapi? This could
> >> > be
> >> > 
> >> > > very useful for those odd people outside Boost who don't really like
> >> > > >
> >> > 
> >> > including <windows.h>.
> >> 
> >> I'm ok with winapi name (actually, it sounds better).
> >> 
> >> But I don't want to make it a public library.
> > 
> > OK. So we (read I) make a sub-module winapi, in libs/winapi, with you and
> > Vicente having write access, but don't add it to libraries.htm. Right?
> 
> It could possibly have a 'meta/libraries.json' file, with an extra
> attribute, say "public": false. Then I could hide it on the website,
> but add a link to show private libraries.

That would be even better.