Boost logo

Boost :

Subject: Re: [boost] [pimpl] No documentation for pointer semantics
From: Paul A. Bristow (pbristow_at_[hidden])
Date: 2014-06-06 04:51:36

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Boost [mailto:boost-bounces_at_[hidden]] On Behalf Of Rob Stewart
> Sent: 06 June 2014 03:55
> To: boost_at_[hidden]
> Subject: Re: [boost] [pimpl] No documentation for pointer semantics
> On June 5, 2014 10:08:15 PM EDT, Vladimir Batov
> <Vladimir.Batov_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> >
> >I'll try to re-do the relevant parts as you suggest.
> >Won't do in in a hurry though remembering my experience with "convert",
> >right? :-)
> Since the review hasn't started, change all you like.

I unhappy with a review rigid policy that nothing can be changed during a
review. It isn't always helpful.

We never accept anything without requiring some changes?

Can we instead now use git's easy branches to specify a fixed 'master' branch,
but allow the author to update a 'develop' branch as the review develops?

That way typos and more serious mistakes can be corrected as the review
proceeds. This will avoid people being confused by these.


Paul A. Bristow
Prizet Farmhouse
Kendal UK LA8 8AB
+44 01539 561830

Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at