Subject: Re: [boost] [pimpl] No documentation for pointer semantics
From: Paul A. Bristow (pbristow_at_[hidden])
Date: 2014-06-06 04:51:36
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Boost [mailto:boost-bounces_at_[hidden]] On Behalf Of Rob Stewart
> Sent: 06 June 2014 03:55
> To: boost_at_[hidden]
> Subject: Re: [boost] [pimpl] No documentation for pointer semantics
> On June 5, 2014 10:08:15 PM EDT, Vladimir Batov
> <Vladimir.Batov_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> >I'll try to re-do the relevant parts as you suggest.
> >Won't do in in a hurry though remembering my experience with "convert",
> >right? :-)
> Since the review hasn't started, change all you like.
I unhappy with a review rigid policy that nothing can be changed during a
review. It isn't always helpful.
We never accept anything without requiring some changes?
Can we instead now use git's easy branches to specify a fixed 'master' branch,
but allow the author to update a 'develop' branch as the review develops?
That way typos and more serious mistakes can be corrected as the review
proceeds. This will avoid people being confused by these.
--- Paul A. Bristow Prizet Farmhouse Kendal UK LA8 8AB +44 01539 561830
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk