Re: [boost] [pimpl] No documentation for pointer semantics

Subject: Re: [boost] [pimpl] No documentation for pointer semantics
From: Paul A. Bristow (pbristow_at_[hidden])
Date: 2014-06-06 04:51:36

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Boost [mailto:boost-bounces_at_[hidden]] On Behalf Of Rob Stewart
> Sent: 06 June 2014 03:55
> To: boost_at_[hidden]
> Subject: Re: [boost] [pimpl] No documentation for pointer semantics
> 
> On June 5, 2014 10:08:15 PM EDT, Vladimir Batov
> <Vladimir.Batov_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> >
> >I'll try to re-do the relevant parts as you suggest.
> >Won't do in in a hurry though remembering my experience with "convert",
> >right? :-)
> 
> Since the review hasn't started, change all you like.

I unhappy with a review rigid policy that nothing can be changed during a
review.  It isn't always helpful. 

We never accept anything without requiring some changes?

Can we instead now use git's easy branches to specify a fixed 'master' branch,
but allow the author to update a 'develop' branch as the review develops?

That way typos and more serious mistakes can be corrected as the review
proceeds.  This will avoid people being confused by these.

Paul

---
Paul A. Bristow
Prizet Farmhouse
Kendal UK LA8 8AB
[phone]