Subject: Re: [boost] [modularization] Extracting lexical_cast from conversion
From: Paul A. Bristow (pbristow_at_[hidden])
Date: 2014-06-06 14:08:09
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Boost [mailto:boost-bounces_at_[hidden]] On Behalf Of John Maddock
> Sent: 06 June 2014 18:26
> To: boost_at_[hidden]
> Subject: Re: [boost] [modularization] Extracting lexical_cast from conversion
> On 06/06/2014 18:08, Vicente J. Botet Escriba wrote:
> > Conversion depends on Math and Range due to lexical_cast.
> > |Extracting LexicalCast allows to break these cycle|s
> > Conversion -> Math -> Conversion
> > -> Range -> Conversion
> > Best,
> > Vicente
> > P.S. This dependencies have been introduced lately while trying to
> > make the implementation more efficient.
> And it's sensible to reuse that code rather than reinvent the wheel.
> I'm open to the idea of some sort of "Math core" lib, even though it's likely
> feature creep, but provided - and this is going to be the controversial bit -
> and docs remain in the "one true Math lib". In other words it's just a small
> containing some headers, with links to the Math lib for docs and tests.
I'm concerned at the documentation implications of this too! :-)
But links to the "one true Math docs" could also be provided?
--- Paul A. Bristow Prizet Farmhouse Kendal UK LA8 8AB +44 01539 561830
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk