Subject: Re: [boost] hash_fwd dependency
From: Daniel James (dnljms_at_[hidden])
Date: 2014-06-08 15:06:59
On 8 June 2014 13:22, Peter Dimov <lists_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> Had you just said "I agree that splitting 'hash' is a good idea, but I don't
> have time for that before the release", that would have been that.
But that isn't what I think. I want to wait and see how the current
crop of changes work out before making a decision.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk