Subject: Re: [boost] hash_fwd dependency
From: Peter Dimov (lists_at_[hidden])
Date: 2014-06-08 08:22:25
> Why the rush? I've got enough things to deal with in this release, I don't
> want to add another.
There is no rush. I had misinterpreted your responses as your being opposed
to 'hash' being its own module.
Expecting me to scan the archives each time is a high bar. Perhaps others
are capable of that; I am not.
Had you just said "I agree that splitting 'hash' is a good idea, but I don't
have time for that before the release", that would have been that.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk