Boost logo

Boost :

Subject: Re: [boost] [config] config_test fails on g++ 4.8/4.9
From: Peter Dimov (lists_at_[hidden])
Date: 2014-06-10 13:15:18

John Maddock wrote:
> Is this a corner case - in which case we should change the test case - or
> should lambda's be disabled with GCC (seems harsh?) - ah I see this is a
> result of a warning suppression change, I'll change the test to actually
> make use of the lambda - seems like the test case was too contrived.

I've sent you a pull request that changes it to [](){}(); (among other
things) - which calls the lambda instead of discarding it.

Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at