Subject: Re: [boost] date_time -> serialization (Was: spirtit -> serialization)
From: Paul A. Bristow (pbristow_at_[hidden])
Date: 2014-06-15 13:21:10
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Boost [mailto:boost-bounces_at_[hidden]] On Behalf Of Andrey
> Sent: 15 June 2014 16:42
> To: boost_at_[hidden]
> Subject: Re: [boost] date_time -> serialization (Was: spirtit ->
> On Sun, Jun 15, 2014 at 7:16 PM, Paul A. Bristow <pbristow_at_[hidden]>
> > If someone is using Serialisation then isn't there a very high
> > probability that they are also using DateTime?
> I'd say there isn't. I'd say even if a user uses both Serialization and
> doesn't mean he uses Serialization support in DateTime.
Ah - I had misunderstood DateTime did not imply Serialization support in
However, does my general point is that many users are already pulling in a large
part of Boost, which may mean that your efforts may not be as useful in practice
as in theory?
> > Sub-sub-modules sound Very Evil to me.
More complicated file layout.
Will there be a sub-module GIT repo? Already getting sub-modules updated is
Bound to have side-effects?
I've no idea how to avoid them, but they "Sound Evil" - if not "Smell Evil" ;-)
--- Paul A. Bristow Prizet Farmhouse Kendal UK LA8 8AB +44 01539 561830
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk