Subject: [boost] [interest] Is there interest in planar angle library ?
From: Matus Chochlik (chochlik_at_[hidden])
Date: 2014-06-18 02:02:12
On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 11:52 PM, Robert Ramey <ramey_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> how would this differ from boost units?
For one thing, in its dependencies, Boost.Units is a wonderful library, but
for many use-cases it is too heavyweight. As mentioned before this library
depends only on standard cmath.
Also this library is more specialized on angle operations than Boost.Units
is, at least out of the box.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk