Re: [boost] [interest] Is there interest in planar angle library ?

Subject: Re: [boost] [interest] Is there interest in planar angle library ?
From: Erik Erlandson (eje_at_[hidden])
Date: 2014-06-18 20:25:35

----- Original Message -----
> On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 11:52 PM, Robert Ramey <ramey_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> 
> > how would this differ from boost units?
> >
> 
> For one thing, in its dependencies, Boost.Units is a wonderful library, but
> for many use-cases it is too heavyweight. As mentioned before this library
> depends only on standard cmath.
> Also this library is more specialized on angle operations than Boost.Units
> is, at least out of the box.

Another alternative might be to provide a Boost.Units wrapper-interface for your library.  It could serve as an alternative and/or extension to the capabilities provided in <boost/units/cmath.hpp>.  That way, if people wanted a thin version they could use yours directly, or if they wanted the same capability with units they could use the Boost.Units interface.