Re: [boost] Help with understanding regression test results

Subject: Re: [boost] Help with understanding regression test results
From: Tom Kent (lists_at_[hidden])
Date: 2014-06-23 09:36:54

On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 7:06 AM, Andrey Semashev <andrey.semashev_at_[hidden]>
wrote:

> On Monday 23 June 2014 13:57:50 Andrzej Krzemienski wrote:
> > 2014-06-23 13:53 GMT+02:00 Andrey Semashev <andrey.semashev_at_[hidden]>:
> > >
> > > Yes, looks like a problem. Maybe the checkout failed at some point for
> the
> > > tester, and Boost.Optional submodule was left in outdated state. I
> > > sometimes
> > > get timeouts from GitHub when I update Boost tree, I think in such
> cases
> > > the
> > > tree is left in some semi-updated state; I didn't check though. If the
> > > update
> > > scripts ignore such errors then that's what may have happened.
> >
> > What's the procedure in such cases? Can the owners of the
> > machines/environments /scripts be contacted?
>
> Yes, if the contact information is available in the tester description (the
> link in the test results table header). E.g. for your tester the
> information
> is:
>
>
> http://www.boost.org/development/tests/develop/teeks99-03e-Ubuntu12-04-64.html
>
> Tom is usually reading this list, I hope he's reading this.
>

I'm not sure what is going on...that commit
"c12eaea160fa97a0b6c503eb8f7fdba938f3126f"
was only a few hours old, and was the most recent at the time that the run
you linked started (4AM).

I didn't think it was possible to get a partial checkout, but who knows.
Because of space issues on the VMs that are running, I don't keep anything
between runs, so I can't actually go and look at the repo that was used for
the test in question.

The next run that should be complete is teeks99-03g. It looks like it has
the correct code at line 1073 (am I reading that correctly?).  Once that
one comes up, we'll see if everything has caught up.

Also, I verified that teeks99-04a just started up and there were no
checkout errors that I could see during the start up, so that one might be
worth checking in a couple hours as well.

Tom