Subject: Re: [boost] Help with understanding regression test results
From: Andrzej Krzemienski (akrzemi1_at_[hidden])
Date: 2014-06-30 05:43:09
2014-06-23 15:36 GMT+02:00 Tom Kent <lists_at_[hidden]>:
> On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 7:06 AM, Andrey Semashev <
> > On Monday 23 June 2014 13:57:50 Andrzej Krzemienski wrote:
> > > 2014-06-23 13:53 GMT+02:00 Andrey Semashev <andrey.semashev_at_[hidden]
> > > >
> > > > Yes, looks like a problem. Maybe the checkout failed at some point
> > the
> > > > tester, and Boost.Optional submodule was left in outdated state. I
> > > > sometimes
> > > > get timeouts from GitHub when I update Boost tree, I think in such
> > cases
> > > > the
> > > > tree is left in some semi-updated state; I didn't check though. If
> > > > update
> > > > scripts ignore such errors then that's what may have happened.
> > >
> > > What's the procedure in such cases? Can the owners of the
> > > machines/environments /scripts be contacted?
> > Yes, if the contact information is available in the tester description
> > link in the test results table header). E.g. for your tester the
> > information
> > is:
> > Tom is usually reading this list, I hope he's reading this.
> I'm not sure what is going on...that commit
> was only a few hours old, and was the most recent at the time that the run
> you linked started (4AM).
> I didn't think it was possible to get a partial checkout, but who knows.
> Because of space issues on the VMs that are running, I don't keep anything
> between runs, so I can't actually go and look at the repo that was used for
> the test in question.
> The next run that should be complete is teeks99-03g. It looks like it has
> the correct code at line 1073 (am I reading that correctly?). Once that
> one comes up, we'll see if everything has caught up.
> Also, I verified that teeks99-04a just started up and there were no
> checkout errors that I could see during the start up, so that one might be
> worth checking in a couple hours as well.
7 days after, teeks99-03g and teeks99-04a still fail and error messages
refer to the code that has not been in 'develop' for a long while. There
are more environments that report references to a no-longer existent code.
It appears as though the sources are downloaded from the different source
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk