Subject: [boost] Libraries failing across the board.
From: Matthew Musto (matthew.musto_at_[hidden])
Date: 2014-07-09 19:22:56
Just so I am clear, you are saying that 1.56 cannot be relied upon by users
who need ublas as there is no intention of making it work?
If that is true, this release is effectively worthless to me or anyone else
who needs any other library in conjunction with ublas? For example, I rely
heavily upon threads, serialization, asio and numeric/ublas. 1.55 did not
compile on VS2013 and there was much hope for this release which now seems
>Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2014 23:24:15 +0100
>From: David Bellot <david.bellot_at_[hidden]>
>To: "boost_at_[hidden]" <boost_at_[hidden]>
>Subject: Re: [boost] Libraries failing across the board.
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
>for ublas we decided to skip this release and concentrate on 1.57 as we
>have more patches coming.
>On Tue, Jul 8, 2014 at 10:07 PM, Beman Dawes <bdawes_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>> Marshall is just a few days away from being able to put out a beta
>> candidate. (And that is very good news!)
>> But we still have too many libraries failing across the board on master:
>> See http://www.boost.org/development/tests/master/developer/summary.html
>> What is the hold up with these? Does anyone need help?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk