Subject: Re: [boost] Showstopper for Boost 1.56?
From: Niall Douglas (s_sourceforge_at_[hidden])
Date: 2014-07-29 08:17:13
On 29 Jul 2014 at 13:41, Marc Glisse wrote:
> > Yes, clang has a lot more warning. Which ones did you enable?
> >> GCC 4.8 produces no such spew.
> > gcc is lacking some warnings.
> The main warnings I see here are about C99 macros (empty or variadic). gcc
> also has those warnings, but they are useless enough that it doesn't
> enable them by default.
Firstly I didn't see these warnings in Boost 1.55. Something has
I think we all agree that 23Mb of warnings spew per build using Boost
1.56 with clang is unacceptable for release. Either
Boost.Preprocessor needs fixing, or clang toolset builds explicitly
need to add -Wno-c99-extensions to every Boost build.
-- ned Productions Limited Consulting http://www.nedproductions.biz/ http://ie.linkedin.com/in/nialldouglas/
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk