Re: [boost] [Container] Provide more guarantees for flat_multimap

Subject: Re: [boost] [Container] Provide more guarantees for flat_multimap
From: Niall Douglas (s_sourceforge_at_[hidden])
Date: 2014-08-15 12:30:57

On 15 Aug 2014 at 0:28, Vinícius dos Santos Oliveira wrote:

> Currently, flat_multimap mirrors C++98's multimap concept.
> 
> I'd like to propose an update to flat_multimap fulfil the C++11's multimap
> concept.

Can I persuade you to also implement the N3645 
(http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2013/n3645.pdf) 
extensions?

If you're interested, they have become enhanced since, and I can tell 
you those enhancements on request. However, the essence of the 
extensions remains the same - they make maps much faster and lower 
latency by letting you do node allocation outside of any mutex locks.

Niall

-- 
ned Productions Limited Consulting
http://www.nedproductions.biz/ 
http://ie.linkedin.com/in/nialldouglas/