Subject: Re: [boost] [Container] Provide more guarantees for flat_multimap
From: Niall Douglas (s_sourceforge_at_[hidden])
Date: 2014-08-15 12:30:57
On 15 Aug 2014 at 0:28, Vinícius dos Santos Oliveira wrote:
> Currently, flat_multimap mirrors C++98's multimap concept.
> I'd like to propose an update to flat_multimap fulfil the C++11's multimap
Can I persuade you to also implement the N3645
If you're interested, they have become enhanced since, and I can tell
you those enhancements on request. However, the essence of the
extensions remains the same - they make maps much faster and lower
latency by letting you do node allocation outside of any mutex locks.
-- ned Productions Limited Consulting http://www.nedproductions.biz/ http://ie.linkedin.com/in/nialldouglas/
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk