Subject: Re: [boost] [Container] Provide more guarantees for flat_multimap
From: Ion Gaztañaga (igaztanaga_at_[hidden])
Date: 2014-08-15 13:02:04
El 15/08/2014 18:30, Niall Douglas escribió:
> On 15 Aug 2014 at 0:28, Vinícius dos Santos Oliveira wrote:
>> Currently, flat_multimap mirrors C++98's multimap concept.
>> I'd like to propose an update to flat_multimap fulfil the C++11's multimap
> Can I persuade you to also implement the N3645
Sure. Open a trac ticket so it's not forgotten. No promise for Boost
> If you're interested, they have become enhanced since, and I can tell
> you those enhancements on request. However, the essence of the
> extensions remains the same - they make maps much faster and lower
> latency by letting you do node allocation outside of any mutex locks.
In which sense they have become enhanced?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk