Re: [boost] [Concepts] Definition. Was [GSoC] [Boost.Hana] Formal review request

Subject: Re: [boost] [Concepts] Definition. Was [GSoC] [Boost.Hana] Formal review request
From: Robert Ramey (ramey_at_[hidden])
Date: 2014-08-16 19:05:26

Niall Douglas wrote
> On 16 Aug 2014 at 10:05, Robert Ramey wrote:
> I'm always very interested in constructive feedback. Do remember the 
> API is designed to be used indirectly as part of an eventual monadic 
> continuations framework, though direct use will always be the most 
> efficient of course. As the tutorial demonstrates, usage fragments 
> into bitty unmaintainable callbacks at scale if you are using the API 
> directly.

Well, I'll look at with no pre-conceptions - as any prospective user would.
So if there's something special I should keep in mind, it would best
be in the documentation somewhere - otherwise I won't know about 
it - don't depend on my memory - I don't.

> I just updated AFIO's entry there to match current. Does it email me 
> when a comment is posted?

amazingly, I can't answer that.  The whole thing depends on a bunch
of plug-ins many of which have unobvious behavior.  So I've found
the only real way to know what is going to happen is to try it. I 
hate spending time on this, but it's the only way I've found short
of writing the code myself - which is even worse.

> If not, do ping me when it's ready.
> 
> Niall

I'll ping the list

Robert Ramey

--
View this message in context: http://boost.2283326.n4.nabble.com/Concepts-Definition-Was-GSoC-Boost-Hana-Formal-review-request-tp4666011p4666455.html
Sent from the Boost - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.