Boost :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Subject: [boost] [process] [sorting] [singularity] [compute] [others] Who needs review manager?
From: Antony Polukhin (antoshkka_at_[hidden])
Date: 2014-09-08 12:03:47

Next message: Andrzej Krzemienski: "Re: [boost] [optional] Changes in Boost.Optional"
Previous message: Sebastian Redl: "Re: [boost] [static_if] Is there interest in a `static if` emulation library?"
Next in thread: Antony Polukhin: "Re: [boost] [process] [sorting] [singularity] [compute] [others] Who needs review manager?"
Maybe reply: Antony Polukhin: "Re: [boost] [process] [sorting] [singularity] [compute] [others] Who needs review manager?"
Reply: Niall Douglas: "Re: [boost] [process] [sorting] [singularity] [compute] [others] Who needs review manager?"

Hi,

Library authors that have no review manager and feel ready for review
please contact me via this mailing list.

-- 
Best regards,
Antony Polukhin

Next message: Andrzej Krzemienski: "Re: [boost] [optional] Changes in Boost.Optional"
Previous message: Sebastian Redl: "Re: [boost] [static_if] Is there interest in a `static if` emulation library?"
Next in thread: Antony Polukhin: "Re: [boost] [process] [sorting] [singularity] [compute] [others] Who needs review manager?"
Maybe reply: Antony Polukhin: "Re: [boost] [process] [sorting] [singularity] [compute] [others] Who needs review manager?"
Reply: Niall Douglas: "Re: [boost] [process] [sorting] [singularity] [compute] [others] Who needs review manager?"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk