Re: [boost] [process] [sorting] [singularity] [compute] [others] Who needs review manager?

Subject: Re: [boost] [process] [sorting] [singularity] [compute] [others] Who needs review manager?
From: Antony Polukhin (antoshkka_at_[hidden])
Date: 2014-09-10 12:00:38

2014-09-10 18:48 GMT+04:00 Niall Douglas <s_sourceforge_at_[hidden]>:

> On 8 Sep 2014 at 20:03, Antony Polukhin wrote:
>
> > Library authors that have no review manager and feel ready for review
> > please contact me via this mailing list.
>
> I would just love to have you manage the review of AFIO.
> Unfortunately, I am just about to begin its monadic continuations
> framework which integrates ASIO, AFIO, future-promises and
> expected<T, E> into one, so I suspect that work will transform any
> review of AFIO significantly.
>

I'd gladly manage the review of AFIO.

When I was looking through the sources of AFIO last time I've got an
impression of ongoing heavy development. That's why there's no [afio] in
the title of this message.

-- 
Best regards,
Antony Polukhin