Subject: Re: [boost] [process] [sorting] [singularity] [compute] [others] Who needs review manager?
From: Niall Douglas (s_sourceforge_at_[hidden])
Date: 2014-09-13 18:47:36
On 13 Sep 2014 at 14:26, Robert Ramey wrote:
> I looked at http://www.boost.org/community/reviews.html and it describes
> the duties of the review manager and reviewers a as separate roles. On
> the other hand, it doesn't specifically proscribe one person performing
> both roles in the same review. So technically you might be correct. But
> in 12 years of being associated with boost, I've never seen this happen.
> (not that It might have - I can't watch everything). And I believe that
Before I acted as review manager for Antony's TypeIndex, I spent a
number of weeks working with Antony to prepare his library for
review. I think this is what Antony was referring to.
Before choosing TypeIndex to manage, I reviewed a number of libraries
in the queue to decide which were reasonably within being ready for
review in my opinion. Most were not. Antony may also be referring to
-- ned Productions Limited Consulting http://www.nedproductions.biz/ http://ie.linkedin.com/in/nialldouglas/
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk