Subject: Re: [boost] [modularization] Are modular releases a goal or a non-goal?
From: Vladimir Prus (vladimir_at_[hidden])
Date: 2014-09-18 01:08:56
On 09/18/2014 12:40 AM, Stephen Kelly wrote:
> I can download one monolithic tarball to get Boost 1.56:
> And I get all of it. There are no separate 'modular Boost' tarballs so that
> I can download what I want and not what I don't.
> Compare to Qt which provides both monolithic source tarballs:
> and modular source tarballs:
> Is something similar to this a goal or a non-goal for 'Boost
It looks that unless you, or somebody else, writes npm-for-c++, then the huge amount
of modules in Boost will make any such modular tarballs be a disservice to users. It's
must easier to just close everything and remove a couple of components that take up
90% of source size.
(Preemptive snarky comment: Qt does not need npm, since the number of modules is
relatively small, and many of them are truly optional)
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk