Subject: Re: [boost] Boost Incubator Status Report
From: Felix Uhl (felix.uhl_at_[hidden])
Date: 2014-11-06 15:32:56
Gordon Woodhull wrote:
> We did update the formal review process and related pages to
> invite people to use the Incubator to garner feedback before their library
> is ready for a formal review. [*]
Thatâs how I found out about it, so I would say the submission to the incubator
is at least encouraged by
Considering that, it seems a bit weird that the incubator has so little activity.
> I don't think Robert ever intended the Incubator to replace the formal review or the role of the Wizards.
> Instead, IMO it is better thought of as a replacement for the unscheduled
> part of the review schedule (aka the Queue), and a better way to verify
> the basic requirements for submitting a library. And reviews can be
> submitted and responded to before the formal review,
> without getting buried in the mailing list.
Thatâs how I understood it, but from my - admittedly sparse - experience, the mailing list
is an excellent place for feedback, because it is guaranteed that quite a few people
will actually get the message.
When I have my library ready for submission to the incubator, how is anyone going
to notice it? Are enough people subscribed to the feeds that a library gets more
attention than in the mailing list, or at least attention from different groups of people?
It seems like the most fundamental element of the incubator is
a dedicated community that is willing to participate, to test and
review. And it is clearly missing exactly that.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk