Subject: Re: [boost] [optional] Safe optional
From: Rob Stewart (robertstewart_at_[hidden])
Date: 2014-11-21 05:38:07
On November 19, 2014 5:05:57 PM EST, "Vicente J. Botet Escriba" <vicente.botet_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> We need some kind of make factory that
>results in something that is implicitly convertible to M<T>.
>what do you think of
> f( explicit 1 );
>to state that we want an explicit conversion to a M<int>?
A change in the overload set can change the meaning of such an expression or make it ambiguous, so it is better to state explicitly the intended conversion.
(Sent from my portable computation engine)
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk