Boost :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Subject: Re: [boost] List of C++ 11 only Boost libraries and their status?
From: Hartmut Kaiser (hartmut.kaiser_at_[hidden])
Date: 2014-11-24 08:20:24

Next message: Nat Goodspeed: "Re: [boost] [Range] New I/O functions for ranges"
Previous message: Marcel Raad: "Re: [boost] [optional] operator<(optional<T>, T) -- is it wrong?"
In reply to: Niall Douglas: "[boost] List of C++ 11 only Boost libraries and their status?"
Next in thread: Gottlob Frege: "Re: [boost] List of C++ 11 only Boost libraries and their status?"
Reply: Gottlob Frege: "Re: [boost] List of C++ 11 only Boost libraries and their status?"
Reply: Niall Douglas: "Re: [boost] List of C++ 11 only Boost libraries and their status?"

> For C++ Now 2015 I am intending to present an overview of C++ 11 only
> Boost libraries in the review queue or very near the review queue by
> the time of the conference. I'd appreciate help filling in missing
> gaps in this list:

*snipped list*

Technically, all libraries in Boost are C++11. What's your point?

Regards Hartmut
---------------
http://boost-spirit.com
http://stellar.cct.lsu.edu

Next message: Nat Goodspeed: "Re: [boost] [Range] New I/O functions for ranges"
Previous message: Marcel Raad: "Re: [boost] [optional] operator<(optional<T>, T) -- is it wrong?"
In reply to: Niall Douglas: "[boost] List of C++ 11 only Boost libraries and their status?"
Next in thread: Gottlob Frege: "Re: [boost] List of C++ 11 only Boost libraries and their status?"
Reply: Gottlob Frege: "Re: [boost] List of C++ 11 only Boost libraries and their status?"
Reply: Niall Douglas: "Re: [boost] List of C++ 11 only Boost libraries and their status?"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk