Subject: Re: [boost] List of C++ 11 only Boost libraries and their status?
From: Hartmut Kaiser (hartmut.kaiser_at_[hidden])
Date: 2014-11-24 17:28:53
> >> For C++ Now 2015 I am intending to present an overview of C++ 11 only
> >> Boost libraries in the review queue or very near the review queue by
> >> the time of the conference. I'd appreciate help filling in missing
> >> gaps in this list:
> > *snipped list*
> > Technically, all libraries in Boost are C++11. What's your point?
> C++11 *only*. (or more precisely >= C++11)
> ie won't work in anything less?
Sure, but what's the point of this? Is it discouraged to use old C style
for() loops now?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk