Re: [boost] [review] [sort] Sort library review manager results

Subject: Re: [boost] [review] [sort] Sort library review manager results
From: Edward Diener (eldiener_at_[hidden])
Date: 2014-11-27 12:06:37

On 11/27/2014 8:47 AM, Mathias Gaunard wrote:
> On 27/11/14 02:32, Edward Diener wrote:
>
>> Review Result:
>>
>> Based on the voting for acceptance or not, based on the discussions
>> during the review period, and based on Steven Ross's responses, I have
>> decided that Steven Ross's library should be accepted into Boost.
>
> I did not really participate in the review, but I did notice there was
> consensus that the documentation was not really satisfactory.
>
> Was this issue already addressed during the review or will it be
> addressed during the integration period?

There were a number of specific documentation suggestions during the 
review period and I think Steven Ross responded to them and is cognizant 
of them. I did mention some of them in the review results. But if you 
have any other documentation suggestions of your own I am sure he is 
listening.