Subject: Re: [boost] [review] [sort] Sort library review manager results
From: Mathias Gaunard (mathias.gaunard_at_[hidden])
Date: 2014-11-27 08:47:16
On 27/11/14 02:32, Edward Diener wrote:
> Review Result:
> Based on the voting for acceptance or not, based on the discussions
> during the review period, and based on Steven Ross's responses, I have
> decided that Steven Ross's library should be accepted into Boost.
I did not really participate in the review, but I did notice there was
consensus that the documentation was not really satisfactory.
Was this issue already addressed during the review or will it be
addressed during the integration period?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk