Subject: Re: [boost] Do we need BoostBook?
From: Robert Ramey (ramey_at_[hidden])
Date: 2014-12-05 18:41:09
Vladimir Prus-3 wrote
> As heretic as it sounds, do we get any benefits from BoostBook? It's a
> complex vocabulary, with complex toolchain,
> and while PDF generation sounded nice 10 years ago, printing HTML into PDF
> is a viable option these days - and nobody
> would want to print entire Boost documentation anyway?
Usage of BoostBook/DocBook isn't required by Boost. Library writers are
free to use any system they want to produce HTML documentation.
Maybe the question you might want to ask is ... Should QuickBook be altered
to produce html directly?
-- View this message in context: http://boost.2283326.n4.nabble.com/Do-we-need-BoostBook-tp4669821p4669823.html Sent from the Boost - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk