Subject: Re: [boost] Do we need BoostBook?
From: Rob Stewart (robertstewart_at_[hidden])
Date: 2014-12-06 08:22:45
On December 6, 2014 2:43:34 AM EST, Robert Ramey <ramey_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>Vladimir Prus-3 wrote
>> So the question I really want
>> to ask is what
>> people's opinion about best documentation solution in 2014. It's
>> intentionally open-ended.
>I think we want to stick the current and historical policy
>of letting each author handle it his preferred way. We could never
>agree on how to do this and I don't think it's worth trying to.
I don't really care how a Boost author implements their documentation, but a consistent look and feel is desirable. If the style ever changes I'd expect those not using QuickBook/DocBook to make the necessary adjustments to match. That may be sufficient reason for most to choose the Boost tool chain.
(Sent from my portable computation engine)
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk