Boost :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Subject: Re: [boost] Do we need BoostBook?
From: pfultz2 (pfultz2_at_[hidden])
Date: 2014-12-08 10:12:53

Next message: Paul A. Bristow: "Re: [boost] [documentation] Are SVG's in documentation viable now?"
Previous message: Marc Glisse: "Re: [boost] [documentation] Are SVG's in documentation viable now?"
In reply to: Vladimir Prus: "Re: [boost] Do we need BoostBook?"
Next in thread: John Maddock: "Re: [boost] Do we need BoostBook?"

> QuickBook, likewise, is not required. So the question I really want to ask
is what
> people's opinion about best documentation solution in 2014. It's
> intentionally
> open-ended.

I use mkdocs for smaller libraries. It works nicely. I just write the
documentation in markdown. However, for a larger project, I think I would
use
sphinx or perhaps cldocs.

Paul

--
View this message in context: http://boost.2283326.n4.nabble.com/Do-we-need-BoostBook-tp4669821p4669913.html
Sent from the Boost - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Next message: Paul A. Bristow: "Re: [boost] [documentation] Are SVG's in documentation viable now?"
Previous message: Marc Glisse: "Re: [boost] [documentation] Are SVG's in documentation viable now?"
In reply to: Vladimir Prus: "Re: [boost] Do we need BoostBook?"
Next in thread: John Maddock: "Re: [boost] Do we need BoostBook?"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk