Subject: Re: [boost] Do we need BoostBook?
From: pfultz2 (pfultz2_at_[hidden])
Date: 2014-12-08 10:12:53
> QuickBook, likewise, is not required. So the question I really want to ask
> people's opinion about best documentation solution in 2014. It's
I use mkdocs for smaller libraries. It works nicely. I just write the
documentation in markdown. However, for a larger project, I think I would
sphinx or perhaps cldocs.
-- View this message in context: http://boost.2283326.n4.nabble.com/Do-we-need-BoostBook-tp4669821p4669913.html Sent from the Boost - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk