Subject: Re: [boost] Duration of formal reviews
From: Kyle Lutz (kyle.r.lutz_at_[hidden])
Date: 2014-12-12 16:06:20
On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 8:24 AM, Vladimir Prus
> Some time ago we had a poll about formal reviews problems:
> The majority said that ten days are not enough. Of course, it's not very
> statistically significant, but that's the only data we've got, and we have
> a rather sparse schedule. How about trying two weeks for a formal review?
The review for my proposed Boost.Compute library is beginning next
Monday. I'd be in favor of a two week review period.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk