Subject: Re: [boost] Duration of formal reviews
From: Edward Diener (eldiener_at_[hidden])
Date: 2014-12-12 17:14:14
On 12/12/2014 11:24 AM, Vladimir Prus wrote:
> Some time ago we had a poll about formal reviews problems:
> The majority said that ten days are not enough. Of course, it's not very
> statistically significant, but that's the only data we've got, and we have
> a rather sparse schedule. How about trying two weeks for a formal review?
In fact I can see review lasting another week, but I agree that two
weeks should be minimum.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk