Subject: Re: [boost] Boost.Sort library hierarchy and namespacing
From: John Bytheway (jbytheway+boost_at_[hidden])
Date: 2014-12-22 22:25:22
On 2014-12-09 06:30, Steven Ross wrote:
> For the Boost.Sort library, I'm planning to add these (non-detail) files:
> Should all of these be in the boost::sort namespace? It seems silly to
> have a boost::sort::spreadsort namespace when there are only 5
> publicly-visible functions in it. I actually can't imagine how of these
> names will conflict with names in other boost libraries, but using a
> boost::sort namespace appears conventional.
> Are there any objections or concerns based on this?
I would strongly encourage you to make the include path match the
namespace; that way there's only one thing for users to remember. So either
boost::sort::integer_sort in boost/sort/integer_sort.hpp