Boost logo

Boost :

Subject: Re: [boost] [test] Applying outstanding pull requests to develop and schedule merge of develop to master
From: Gennadiy Rozental (rogeeff_at_[hidden])
Date: 2014-12-26 05:17:06


Brian Schrom <brian.schrom <at> pnnl.gov> writes:

>
> On 12/11/2014 04:28 PM, Jamie Allsop wrote:
> >
> > To recap - it is time to start actively shepherding patches into
> > Boost.Test develop, but more importantly, it is time we started
> > looking at a schedule for merging Boost.Test develop to master. The
> > longer it is left the worse the impact will be. A lot of good work has
> > been done on develop - the longer it stays there the more people will
> > move away from Boost.Test in their own code and it will only have
> > relevance to Boost libraries themselves.
> >
> > Jamie
> I really think that boost test needs to be it's own product (and
> development cycle) and that Boost references a released binary of it.

Isn't this what Modular Boost is all about? Boost.Test master is latest
release everybody depends on. Boost.Test devel is where new features are
developed.

Gennadiy


Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk