Subject: Re: [boost] [core] A better boost::swap
From: Ion Gaztañaga (igaztanaga_at_[hidden])
Date: 2014-12-28 16:05:50
El 28/12/2014 a las 19:42, Pete Bartlett escribió:
>> I'm sure Antony meant to change the implementation to match the ideas in
> Ion's code, not use >the test implementation he showed.
> But isn't the whole idea to depend on Boost.Move so that swap can benefit
> from move emulation?
> As Peter said, a new Boost.Swap could depend on Move, but Core should not.
The part used by adl_move_swap is about Level 2 (because it depends on
BOOST_STATIC_ASSERT). Without BOOST_STATIC_ASSERT it would be Level 0.
Boost.Move is Level 4 because some header depends on TypeTraits.
Obviously the dependency report can't show this.
Is the dependency report based on master or develop branch? I can't see
any mention to this. It would be nice if the report could show this in
the last "Generated on ...." line.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk